Who said, all any politician can do is make promises, tax, spend and enter debt?
America needs jobs. Jobs will remain scarce if not nonexistent and unrecoverable. Poverty will increase as more people require public assistance and the economy will not recover at a rate that will promote prosperity. The recent SOTU address indicated more dysfunction, instability, stagnancy, higher taxes and unsustainable fiscal pursuits otherwise known as promises and ideas (Hope and Change, take another hit of Hopium, please.)
Special note: for those fans and critics of the various political parties, I hope I am wrong – I want a successful/prosperous people, country and world.
Covering health and financial data:
From Forbes:
During President Obama’s State of the Union last night, he left no doubt which side of the green line he stood — with the environmental movement. Besides his unwavering support for clean energy, he alluded to the administration’s new mercury rule.
Regarding mercury, the nation’s coal-fired power plants emit half of all those emissions that are responsible for causing heart attacks, birth defects and delayed childhood development. The White House may have acted to solidify its environmental base but, in doing so, it is following the law and giving modern generators a shot to compete with their older coal cousins.
No! Mercury is healthy for you see the video!
“I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury poison,” says President Obama, in his State of the Union last night.
Impossible! Mercury is healthy for you see the video!
On December 21, 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency carried out its obligation under the 1990 Clean Air Act and demanded that coal-fired power plants implement the available technologies to reduce their emissions by 90 percent. Specifically, the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled in March 2011 that EPA must develop a final rule with respect to mercury emissions by year-end 2011.
The regulations are not a shock to most utilities, which have already taken the steps to implement the necessary tools to make such reductions. The EPA estimates that of the roughly 1,400 coal-and-oil-fired generators, 60 percent have implemented new technologies while 40 percent, or 600 of them have not.
Of those, it estimates that about 1 percent will choose to shut down their operations as opposed to clean up — a number that is contested by coal-related organizations that argue the ruling will drive up electricity prices and cut jobs.
Gee, will the mercury in vaccinations and its cumulative build-up in recipients bodies be removed too?
From Natural News:
Deniers of the link between mercury-laden vaccines and autism are going to have a hard time denying the latest findings by the Coalition for Mercury-Free Drugs (CoMeD). The nonprofit group has obtained critical documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that exposes the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) role in deliberately lying about and manipulating a key Danish study that showed a clear link between vaccines containing mercury and autism.
In 2003, the journal Pediatrics published a study conducted in Denmark that observed a significant decline in autism rates following the country’s elimination of Thimerosal, a mercury-based component, from vaccines. But thanks to the CDC’s corrupting influence, the published version of the study in Pediatrics actually claimed the opposite, and alleged that removal of Thimerosal brought about an increase in autism rates.
According to the documents, CDC officials removed large amounts of data from the study that showed a decline in autism rates following the removal of Thimerosal. The agency then twisted the remaining data to imply an increase in autism rates following the removal of Thimerosal, and suggested that there was no link between Thimerosal and autism.
Upon submission of the CDC’s tainted version of the study to Pediatrics, the study’s authors contacted CDC officials to let them know that the agency had incorrectly interpreted the data. They tried to tell the CDC that its figures and conclusions were wrong, and that corrections needed to be made.
In housing and foreclosures, get ready for another rip-off. The following content is from Mish Shedlock’s blog:
Inquiring minds are reading the complete text of President Obama’s State of the Union Address to see what distortions, lies, and hypocrisy it contains.
I found a nice Orwellian set of paragraphs smack in the middle of his speech.
And while Government can’t fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn’t have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.
That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.
Let’s never forget: Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same. It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.Top to Bottom: More Bailouts, More Handouts, More Copouts
While reading the first paragraph above I knew without a doubt a huge bailout proposal was coming up.
Sure enough, the very next paragraph contained a massive bailout proposal and in more ways than is readily apparent at first glance. For starters “responsible homeowners” don’t need mortgage relief. Secondly, $300 a month is a lot of dough so I would like to see an accounting.
Finally, and most importantly, every loan that is refinanced will be paid off in full. Thus, any bank, hedge fund, mortgage provider, or GSE that is paid off on a nonperforming loan will be immediately made whole.
This is a massive backdoor bailout of banks, mortgage companies, hedge funds, foreign banks, and anyone else holding mortgage related garbage…
How the Taxpayer Ripoff Works
The New York Times explains the ripoff in President to Offer Way for Easing Home Debt
The White House plans to propose legislation that could allow a few million homeowners to reduce monthly mortgage payments by refinancing their current loans into new ones guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration.
The program would broaden the availability of government-backed mortgages to include many borrowers whose loans are held by private companies and who have been unable to persuade those lenders to reduce their interest rates. Existing federal programs focus mostly on borrowers whose loans are owned by the government.
The new program will be directed at people whose mortgage debts exceed the value of their homes, according to a senior administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the details have not yet been finalized. The official estimated that the program could benefit two million to three million homeowners who have loans that are not guaranteed by the government, and that the program’s cost would not exceed $10 billion.$10 Billion?! Really?
The proposal as outlined rates to take every “responsible” underwater mortgage held by banks, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, hedge funds, foreign banks, and pension plans, and transfer all of them to the FHA. The idea this will only cost $10 billion is absurd.
The “small fees on the largest financial institutions” are absolutely guaranteed to not cover the cost of this monstrous proposal. Indeed there is something in Obama’s proposal for everyone except “responsible citizens”.
“Let’s never forget: Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day” will be royally screwed by Obama’s proposition in the form of higher taxes down the road.
Nomi Prins says issues were skirted during the SOTU address. She outlines 10 issues that were ignored to some degree or another regarding healthcare costs, student loan debt, education and youth unemployment.
To seasoned observers, the SOTU address sounded like mass financial chaos but to the average voter, this kind of talk is wonderful, helpful and all of it can really, really, really happen. This speech sounded recycled and was presented on a 4th grade level.
Unfortunately, the GOP chooses to run unpopular candidates like (McCain 2008) Mitt, Newt, Rick while ignoring Rep. Ron Paul. If the American people received confidence from the SOTU address, the current administration will win in 2012 – this can happen even if the current administration is unpopular.
The only man to vote for GOP Rep. Ron Paul. A victory for Mitt, Newt, Rick or the current president, will ensure the above dysfunction and deception in public policy.
Filed under: debt/monetary policy/banking, politics | Leave a Comment »